Activists commented on the results of the discussions regarding the construction of a church on the embankment in Krasnodar.

THIS MATERIAL (INFORMATION) WAS PRODUCED AND DISTRIBUTED BY THE FOREIGN AGENT MEMO LLC, OR CONCERNING THE ACTIVITIES OF THE FOREIGN AGENT MEMO LLC.

The results of the public discussion of the project to build a church on Rozhdestvenskaya Embankment in Krasnodar are advisory in nature. The commission that made the decision ignored the opinions of residents and recommended transferring the land plots for religious purposes.

As reported by the "Caucasian Knot", on January 16, despite protests from residents, the mayor of Krasnodar approved the planning project for Rozhdestvenskaya Embankment in the Yubileiny microdistrict, where the church is planned to be built. On January 29, Krasnodar City Duma deputies approved a resolution to seize part of a public garden for the construction of a church. A month earlier, on December 15, 2025, residents of Krasnodar's Yubileyny microdistrict, protesting against embankment development, recorded a video message to Vladimir Putin, but their issue was not addressed during the president's direct line. On January 26 and 29, pickets were held in defense of the embankment and demanding the resignation of city mayor Yevgeny Naumov. On March 19, 99% of participants in the public discussion opposed religious ceremonies on the Rozhdestvenskaya Embankment in Krasnodar. However, the commission deemed the opinions of those opposed to the church construction irrelevant and recommended that the mayor grant permission for religious services on the embankment.

Public discussions are effectively equivalent to public hearings, but are held virtually, former Krasnodar deputy and activist Vitaly Cherkasov told a "Caucasian Knot" correspondent, commenting on the March 12 public discussions regarding permission to conduct religious ceremonies at two sites on the embankment in Krasnodar's Yubileyny microdistrict.

"Public hearings, where people can speak into a microphone in the hall, are currently only held on budgetary matters. At least in Krasnodar. Everything else is called public discussions here. It's a kind of mockery—public hearings in absentia." We send comments and objections through "golos krd dot ru." This means people don't gather together, don't see each other, don't see each other's reactions, and don't feel supported. To participate, they register through Gosuslugi (Gosuslugi), supposedly there should also be an option to send comments via email, and a passport scan is also required. The discussion took place over two plots with different cadastral numbers, which were proposed for the construction of a church. The "Azbuka Gorozhanina" (ABCs of the City) website contains links to PDF files with the names of those discussing the matter. "In one, 853 people were recorded, in the other, 799," he said.

According to the activist, the authorities illegally divided the discussion of the territory they want to transfer to the church into two sections and two separate discussions. "The whole 'trick' is that the hearings themselves are illegal, because they divided the public hearing into two sections. That is, there is a 7,200-square-meter area there. They decided to transfer it for religious rites. But 7,200 meters cannot be transferred by law. No more than 5,000 meters can be transferred. "And to get around this, they came up with this childish way of dividing the area into two sections. This is a complete violation. The administration officially organized these public discussions. But not a single newspaper wrote about it, no television coverage, and no posters were displayed," Cherkasov said.

According to him, the administration, in order to discredit the results of the discussions, claimed that the participants weren't residents of the districts. "The funniest and most tragic thing is that, in the end, the land use commission, which consists of officials and deputies, told many residents that they weren't real participants. Because they supposedly don't own the land next door, don't live there, and so on. And where are we supposed to live? We should live right on the embankment. I don't know who lives on the embankment except homeless people. Or maybe seagulls, or ants in the summer." "In fact, some of the residents who participated in the discussion live in nearby ten-story buildings, which are 30 meters high, and the church is planned to be 65 meters high. That means it will be twice as tall. Plus, how many people will come and park there? This construction will take many years. In short, it's clear that this affects all residents of Yubileyny, and their rights could be violated," Cherkasov believes.

Ultimately, in this case, the commission recommended transferring the plots for religious purposes. And the final decision, in any case, rests with the head of the administration.

He noted that, according to the Urban Development Code, public discussions are required, but their results are advisory in nature. "This could influence the decision of the commission, which is ostensibly independent, although in reality it is entirely composed of pro-government people. But ultimately, in this case, the commission recommended transferring the plots for religious purposes. "And the final word in any case rests with the head of the administration," Cherkasov explained.

He also noted that supporters of the construction are trying to find "anti-Christian" motives in opposing the destruction of the green zone. "All sorts of pro-government political scientists are taking the situation to the point of absurdity, saying that everyone who is against it isn't for the green zone, but is against Christianity," Cherkasov concluded.

Another activist from Yubileyny, who wished to remain anonymous, stated that the problem is that deputies, not to mention officials, don't consider themselves obligated to act in the interests of residents.

"Our elections are being conducted disgracefully. There's essentially only one opposition deputy left in the entire city council. It's not particularly interesting what they say about the people... They don't really care about the citizens' opinions; they simply don't care. It's the same with the administration. "The mayor is no longer elected, he's appointed. Consequently, he's not interested in anything about the citizens, he's said so openly. That's why there were 40 refusals at the Yubileiny rally," he said.

"I believe that until our country has normal, fair elections where deputies from the people and for the people win, this kind of thing will continue. Right now, decisions are being made that are guided not by public opinion, but by the opinions of their superiors, by the law of the land." This is the root of the problem," the activist concluded.

To defend their position, city residents should go to court

One of the founders of the non-profit organization "Green Stanitsa" from the village of Poltavskaya, Sergey Salnikov, told a "Caucasian Knot" correspondent that, according to Article 14 of the Constitution, no religion can be established as a state or mandatory religion.

"In our country, people are religious or non-religious, and no religion should be imposed on people. In this case, I see their constitutional right to express their opinion. People have every right to express their opinion. We also took advantage of this moment when we defended our rights against the landfill in Poltavskaya," he said.

According to the activist, any gathering of residents will be perceived as pressure on a sore spot, especially if they are repeated, then the authorities will be forced to respond to this, and also actively file complaints and lawsuits in court. "If the protest sentiment is truly widespread, for a start they need to at least urgently do the same thing that we did - create "A non-profit environmental organization that can already be legally represented in court. Because it's better for legal entities, rather than individuals, to sue the administration or the Russian Orthodox Church, which is affiliated with the state," Salnikov noted.

According to him, the actions of Russian officials are not truly for the people, and only unity can make them work in their interests. "Often, officials represent and protect each other's interests. Our leaders, even at the local government level, don't like public gatherings. Therefore, they can cite the danger of holding mass events and ban them. And if people want to defend their rights, they will have to resort to legal action, where their rights will be truly represented. This includes holding permitted assemblies, which they will, naturally, be prevented from doing. We worked right up to blocking the highway. At the same time, people were issued fines for participating, and our NGO helped them pay them, providing advice so that they wouldn't participate more than twice. "in the protests. And only after that did they come out to talk to us. Because the problem had already reached a higher level than the municipality of our small district," Salnikov explained.

However, the law does not establish a direct obligation to take into account the majority of opinions. The consideration of results is advisory in nature.

Lawyer Timofey Shirokov confirmed to a "Caucasian Knot" correspondent that public discussions are advisory in nature. "According to parts 21–23 of Article 5.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, following the public discussions, the organizer is obliged to prepare a conclusion on the results, which must indicate: the number of participants; the essence of the proposals and comments made; reasoned recommendations on the advisability or inadvisability of taking each of them into account; general conclusions. Thus, the formal responsibility of the authorities is to conduct the procedure, record opinions, analyze them, and publicly justify them. "The decision made. However, the law does not establish a direct obligation to take into account the majority of opinions. Taking into account the results is advisory in nature," he said.

Lawyer Felix Vertegel, in turn, noted that any public mass event (rally, march, etc.) must be pre-approved (permitted) by the administration. "As for the construction, it can be challenged in court, but to do this, we need to understand how and by whom the decision to build was made," he told a "Caucasian Knot" correspondent.

"Caucasian Knot" also wrote that in November, opponents of the construction of the church in Yubileiny, together with representatives of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, began collecting signatures demanding the resignation of Mayor Yevgeny Naumov.

In September 2024, residents of the Yubileiny microdistrict of Krasnodar protested against the construction Rozhdestvenskaya Embankment, where, according to the city's new general plan, a church was planned. They explained that this was the only major recreation area in the neighborhood. Activists collected signatures for a petition to Governor Veniamin Kondratyev against the development of Rozhdestvenskaya Embankment. More than 3,000 signatures were collected. Activist Vitaly Cherkasov and City Duma deputy Alexander Safronov were detained while collecting signatures and fined by the court. However, in November, city council deputies adopted a new general plan despite protests from residents.

Residents of the neighborhood actively protested against the development of the embankment, explaining that it was the only major recreation area in the neighborhood. However, in November 2024, city council deputies adopted a new general plan despite their protests.

Back in December 2021, activists protested against the construction of a new church on the embankment in Krasnodar, and residents of the Yubileiny neighborhood also protested. Embankment defenders believe it is necessary to build educational and leisure facilities for children in the neighborhood. In January 2022, activist Yana Antonova held a solo picket against the transfer of land on the embankment to the Russian Orthodox Church for the construction of a church.